Key
Concepts:
· There was a decrease in revenue
from continuing activities for the year.
· There was increase in earnings
before tax, interest, depreciation and amortisation.
· No dividends were paid or
proposed during the year.
· The net assets increased by
$6,878,315 from 30 June 2012 to 30 June 2013 – and this is largely due to the
refinancing of company’s debt during the year, partially offset by the net loss
from operations for the year.
· Oldfields Holdings had purchased
$8 million of debt from Westpac (its primary lender) for a payment of $2.5
million.
· Gross margins improved mainly
due to an increase in the company’s efficiency and better utilisation of labour
in the scaffolding division (48.3% - 48.7%)
· Revenue for paint applications
was in line with the previous financial year.
· The garden shed division
experienced a decline in the last year
· Total revenue in the scaffold
division declined 9.6% compared to prior year, due to a reduction in
scaffolding equipment sales (a large one-off sale from early 2012 was not
repeated the following year).
· Positive customer feedback on
all products and services supplied by the company is important.
· Expected progress during the
year is going to provide a good foundation for profitable growth in the future.
· To ensure that new products
that are launched throughout the year remain successful, Oldfields Holdings
devises a full marketing support program to put in place.
· The company has also put a
supplier rationalisation program in place, therefore reducing suppliers, which
has ultimately allowed for negotiation of better costs, reduced logistics
costs, as well as improved inventory management.
· Management and focus changes
have been made to the garden shed division in order to create an increase in
revenue and profitability, concentrating particularly on gaining additional
distribution in the retail sector.
· Revenue declines have been
experienced in the professional painting market and was impacted in the decline
in new building approvals during the year.
· A private label contract was
lost during the year which influenced top line revenue growth however did not
impact on the company’s profit.
· The garden shed division has
experienced a decline in the last year due to a reduction in --domestic sales
caused by an ongoing decline in consumer spending and minimal distribution in
major hardware outlets.
· The division was also impacted
by a customer in South Australia being placed into Administration which
resulted in a bad debt of $83,647
· With a particular focus on
Western Australia and Victoria, there has been less construction activity,
therefore it has become a competitive sector for the company.
· Oldfields Holdings had purchased
$8 million of debt from Westpac Bank (its primary lender) for a payment of $2.5
million.
· Recent packaging and products
launched have received positive customer feedback, and this is expected to
continue as more products are to be updated in the coming year.
Key
Questions:
· 1. What is amortisation?
· 2.What is the reasoning for
Westpac reducing the amount of debt that Oldfields Holdings owed them – what is
the benefit to Westpac in doing this?
· 3. Which sector of the company has
this debt arisen from? - It does not stipulate/pin point a particular area of the company.
· 4. How did the company manage to
refinance the debt?
· 5. Why does the company proceed to
have one off sales one year and not the next, therefore experiencing a decline
in total revenue for one sector?
· 6. Is there more behind the
figures and information that they have provided?
No comments:
Post a Comment